The Long Road to the Ballot Box: Indigenous Voting Rights in Canada

The history of Indigenous voting rights in Canada is a story of resilience, resistance, and a fight for something that should have been theirs from the start. It is a right most Canadians take for granted today, but for First Nations, Métis, and Inuit peoples, it came at an enormous cost, and the journey is not quite over yet.

Let us dive into this complex and ultimately inspiring chapter of Canadian history.

The Original Democracy

Here is something that often gets overlooked in history classes: Indigenous Peoples were practicing sophisticated forms of democracy long before European settlers arrived.

The Haudenosaunee (Iroquois) Confederacy (circa 1200-1600) is considered one of the earliest examples of participatory democracy in North America. While Europe was still operating under feudalism, the Haudenosaunee had already developed a complex system of governance that influenced democratic thought worldwide.

The Blackfoot Confederacy (circa 1400s) organized itself around bands, each with a male leader who made decisions—but Here is the key—by consensus, not by decree. Leadership was not about power; it was about listening and building agreement.

The Mi'kmaq Grand Council (before 1500) operated with a grand chief and made consensus-driven decisions. Leadership was hereditary, passed from father to son, but the council structure ensured collective decision-making.

The Huron-Wendat Village Councils (circa 1500) included all men over 30 as council members who weighed in on both civil and war-related matters. Again, decisions were made by consensus.

Each First Nation had its own way of making decisions based on their needs and values.

Then Came the Indian Act

After colonization, everything changed. First Nations peoples suddenly found themselves subject to laws they had zero input in creating with the Indian Act being the most notorious.

The Indian Act gave First Nations fewer rights than other Canadians. The Canadian government operated under the assumption that Indigenous peoples did not have the knowledge or "ability" to vote and make decisions about public matters.

This was a striking contradiction. The same peoples who had been governing themselves effectively for centuries were suddenly deemed incompetent by the colonial government.

First Nations were excluded from voting for several reasons. Sometimes it was because they did not meet certain qualifications, like property ownership. But in reality, the primary reason was their Indigenous identity. That was the real disqualification.

The Enfranchisement Trap: Vote or Be Indigenous—Pick One

Here is where things became particularly problematic.

Before 1960, First Nations peoples could only vote federally if they gave up their Indian Status through something called "enfranchisement." Introduced as early as 1869, voluntary enfranchisement meant you had to reject your culture, leave your reserve, and assimilate to "Canadian ways." In other words: you could vote, but only if you stopped being who you were first.

Unsurprisingly, few people are voluntarily enfranchised. Who would willingly give up their identity, community, and culture for a ballot?

But there was also involuntary enfranchisement.

Starting in the 1880s, if First Nations earned university degrees or became doctors, lawyers, or religious officials, they were automatically enfranchised—whether they wanted it or not. The government essentially penalized First Nation for being educated and successful.

In the 1920s, Canada involuntarily enfranchised over 5,000 First Nations people because of their specific jobs or educational achievements.

Indigenous peoples opposed enfranchisement for several good reasons:

  1. It was assimilation in disguise. Enfranchisement meant losing recognition as distinct Nations or Peoples. It was a cultural erasure with a bureaucratic stamp.

  2. Canada's voting system was unfamiliar and unnecessary. Indigenous peoples already had effective ways of governing and determining leaders. Why would they abandon systems that worked for one that had been used to oppress them?

War Changes Everything (Temporarily)

During World War I and World War II, both First Nations men and women who served in the military gained the ability to vote without losing their Indian Status.

Why the sudden change? One reason cited was that Indigenous peoples "served with distinction"—meaning they exhibited remarkable courage, proficiency, leadership, and commitment throughout their military service.

The Military Act of 1917 allowed Indigenous peoples serving in the military to vote. Between the wars, no one pressured the government to change the Act permanently, so these voting rights remained limited.

But here is what happened next: if Indigenous veterans returned to their reserves after the war, their right to vote was taken away again.

Think about that for a moment. You could risk your life for Canada, but if you wanted to live in your own community afterward, you lost your democratic rights. The message was clear: you can be Canadian enough to die for the country, but not Canadian enough to vote in it—unless you abandon your people.

The Métis and Inuit: Different Paths, Same Destination

The story was not identical for all Indigenous peoples.

Métis people were not excluded from voting because "few were covered by treaties, therefore there was nothing to justify disqualifying them." The absence of treaty obligations meant Métis people could vote. This highlights that the exclusion of First Nations peoples was deliberate policy, not an oversight.

Inuit peoples were excluded from voting despite wanting to participate. The government made little effort to extend voting rights to them, citing "geographic challenges" to implementation.

In 1948, a committee reported and recommended that First Nations peoples should have the right to vote, but amendments were not made to the Indian Act. However, this report did allow Inuit to vote in 1950 because they were "legally considered 'ordinary citizens.'"

But having the right to vote and being able to actually vote are two different things. Despite gaining this right in 1950, there was inadequate access for Inuit to actually cast ballots. It took until 1962 for ballot boxes to be placed in Inuit communities.

Having a right on paper that you cannot exercise because the infrastructure does not exist is a significant barrier to genuine democratic participation.

1960: Finally, the Right to Vote (No Strings Attached)

It took until 1960 for First Nations peoples—both men and women—to have the right to vote in federal elections without giving up their Indian Status.

Prime Minister John Diefenbaker campaigned in 1957 on a platform that included allowing First Nations to vote, and he implemented this change in 1960. After nearly a century of exclusion, enfranchisement traps, and broken promises, Indigenous peoples finally had unconditional access to the ballot box.

Soon after this historic change, Diefenbaker sent Chief Joseph Dreaver of the Mistawasis First Nation to reserves in Saskatchewan to gather opinions on voting and the newly formed NDP party. As soon as Indigenous peoples could vote, politicians naturally wanted to understand their perspectives and priorities.

But even this milestone came with complications. The 1885 Electoral Franchise Act, created by John A. Macdonald, was originally drafted to allow all First Nations to vote, whether enfranchised or not. However, after the North-West Resistance, it was changed to include only First Nations in Manitoba, British Columbia, Keewatin, and the Northwest Territories, OR any First Nation "on any reserve elsewhere in Canada who is not in possession and occupation of a separate and distinct tract of land in such reserve, and whose improvements on such separate tract are not of the value of at least one hundred and fifty dollars."

In other words, even when the government extended voting rights, they included so many conditions that few could actually access them.

Where We Are Today: It Is Complicated

So, problem solved, right? Indigenous peoples can vote now, so everything's fine? Not quite.

Today, about half of First Nations people live on reserves, and voter turnout for those who live on reserve is lower than the general population. But before anyone jumps to conclusions, it is important to understand that opinions on voting federally are genuinely mixed within Indigenous communities.

Some Indigenous peoples believe that participating in federal elections goes against the principle of self-government. If you are a sovereign nation, why would you participate in another nation's electoral system? it is a valid philosophical and political stance.

Others want to participate in Canada's democracy, seeing it as a way to influence policies that affect their communities, advocate for their rights, and hold the government accountable.

There is no single "Indigenous perspective" on voting—just as tHere is no single Indigenous culture or community. The diversity of opinions reflects the diversity of Indigenous peoples themselves.

What is clear is that the legacy of exclusion, forced assimilation, and broken trust does not just disappear because a law changes. Building genuine democratic participation requires more than legal rights—it requires respect, reconciliation, and addressing the systemic barriers that still exist.

The Takeaway

The history of Indigenous voting rights in Canada demonstrates how democracy can be used to exclude the very people it is supposed to serve.

For generations, Indigenous peoples were told they were not capable of voting—despite having sophisticated governance systems long before Canada existed. They were offered the vote only if they abandoned their identity. They were deemed competent enough to die in wars but not competent enough to vote afterward. And when they finally gained unconditional voting rights in 1960, it came more than a century after Confederation.

Understanding this history matters because it shapes the present. It explains why trust in Canadian democratic institutions is not universal. It reminds us that rights we take for granted were hard-won battles for others. And it challenges us to think about what true reconciliation and democratic participation really look like.

The next time you head to the polls, remember: not everyone's journey to the ballot box was this easy. 

Resources

Want to learn more about Indigenous voting rights in Canada? Check out these excellent resources:

Elections Canada: Voting Rights Through Time - First Nations and the Right to Votehttps://electionsanddemocracy.ca/voting-rights-through-time-0/first-nations-and-right-vote-case-study

Indigenous Corporate Training Inc.: Indian Act and the Right to Votehttps://www.ictinc.ca/blog/indian-act-and-the-right-to-vote

The Canadian Encyclopedia: Indigenous Suffragehttps://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/indigenous-suffrage

Elections Canada: Aboriginal Peoples and Electoral Participationhttps://www.elections.ca/content.aspx?section=res&dir=rec/part/abo&document=index&lang=e

Next
Next

I’m tired of feeling like I have to speak for all Indigenous people